Применение алгоритмов машинного обучения для совершенствования моделирования карбонатного рифового резервуара
С.Н. Кривощеков, А.А. Кочнев, И.С. Путилов, Д.О. Ширинкин, А.Н. Боталов, Е.С. Ожгибесов, П.О. Чалова
Сведения об авторах
- Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет, Пермь, Российская Федерация
- Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет, Пермь, Российская Федерация
- Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет, Пермь, Российская Федерация
- Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет, Пермь, Российская Федерация
- Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет, Пермь, Российская Федерация
- Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет, Пермь, Российская Федерация
- Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет, Пермь, Российская Федерация
Аннотация
Разработка и моделирование карбонатных резервуаров сложного строения является актуальной задачей. В условиях высокой неоднородности свойств коллектора, обусловленной особенностями формирования, частой сменой циклов осадконакопления и наличием диагенетических преобразований, возникает высокая степень неопределенности в процессе моделирования и, как следствие, прогноза показателей разработки. Недоучет влияния диагенетических процессов на изменение фильтрационно-емкостных свойств может оказать критическое влияние на организацию и управление системой заводнения. При изучении геологического строения месторождения Альфа выявлены интервалы высокопроницаемых коллекторов (до 18 Дарси). В рамках данного исследования предложен подход выделения подобных интервалов с целью уточнения динамической модели месторождения на основе методов машинного обучения. В работе проведено сравнение следующих алгоритмов: градиентный бустинг, случайный лес и метод опорных векторов. По результатам исследования выявлены оптимальные алгоритмы, позволяющие с высокой степенью точности прогнозировать интервалы высокой проницаемости. Для улучшения адаптации модели по истории разработки месторождения предлагается использовать модель, обученную по данным керна и геофизических исследований скважин. Для учета рисков, связанных с высокопроницаемыми интервалами, при бурении новых скважин рекомендуется использовать модель, обученную только по геофизическим исследованиям скважин. В работе выполнен анализ чувствительности при задании свойств для высокопроницаемых интервалов – абсолютная проницаемость и относительные фазовые проницаемости. Выполнено обновление куба проницаемости динамической модели, адаптация модели и расчеты по оптимизации системы заводнения. На основе прогнозного анализа на модели с высокопроницаемыми интервалами предложен ряд мер по оптимизации системы разработки для снижения рисков прорыва воды в высокопроницаемых интервалах. По результатам прогнозных расчетов эти меры позволят дополнительно получить 750 тыс. м3 нефти.
Ключевые слова
Application of Machine Learning Algorithms for Enhanced Modeling of a Carbonate Reef Reservoir
The development and modeling of carbonate reservoirs with complex structure is an actual task. In conditions of high heterogeneity of reservoir properties due to the peculiarities of formation, frequent change of sedimentation cycles and the presence of diagenetic transformations, there is a high degree of uncertainty in the modeling process and, as a consequence, in the forecast of development indicators. Underestimation of the influence of diagenetic processes on changes in filtration-capacitance properties can have a critical impact on the organization and management of the waterflood system. When studying the geological structure of the Alpha field, intervals of highly permeable reservoirs (up to 18 Darcies) were identified. This study proposes an approach to identify such intervals in order to refine the dynamic model of the field based on machine learning methods. The paper compares the following algorithms: gradient bousting, random forest and support vector method. Based on the results of the study, the optimal algorithms were identified that allow predicting high permeability intervals with a high degree of accuracy. To improve model adaptation to the field development history, it is suggested to use a model trained on core and geophysical well survey data. To take into account the risks associated with highly permeable intervals, when drilling new wells, it is recommended to use a model trained only on geophysical well tests. In this paper, sensitivity analysis was performed when specifying properties for highly permeable intervals - absolute permeability and relative phase permeabilities. The permeability cube of the dynamic model was updated, the model was adapted and calculations on waterflood system optimization were performed. Based on the predictive analysis on the model with highly permeable intervals, a number of measures were proposed to optimize the development system to reduce the risk of water breakthrough in highly permeable intervals. According to the results of the forecast calculations, these measures will provide additional 750 thousand m3 of oil.
Keywords
Литература
- 1.Diagenetic process and their effect on reservoir quality in Miocene carbonate reservoir Offshore, Sarawak, Malaysia / H.T. Janjuhah, A.M.A. Salim, D. Ghosh, A. Wahid // In Proceedings of the International Conference on Integrated Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences. – Singapore, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-3650-7_48 Scholar
- 2.Farzaneh, S.A. Using diagenetic processes in facies modeling of a carbonate reservoir / S.A. Farzaneh, A.A. Dehghan, A. Lakzaie // Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. – 2013. – No. 35 (6). – P. 516–528. DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2010.504946 Scholar
- 3.Study of the influence of nonlinear dynamic loads on elastic modulus of carbonate reservoir rocks / E. Riabokon, M. Turbakov, E. Kozhevnikov, V. Poplygin, M. Guzev // Energies. – 2021. – Vol. 14, no. 24. DOI 10.3390/en14248559 Scholar
- 4.Progress of research on dolomitization and dolomite reservoir / Q. Huang, W. Liu, Y. Zhang, S. Shi, K. Wang // Advances in Earth Science. – 2015. – No. 30 (5). – P. 539. DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.05.0539 Scholar
- 5.A review of development methods and EOR technologies for carbonate reservoirs / Z.X. Xu., S.Y. Li, B.F. Li, D.Q. Chen, Z.Y. Liu, Z.M. Li // Petroleum Science. – 2020. – No. 17. – P. 990–1013. DOI: 10.1007/s12182-020-00467-5. Scholar
- 6.Щербаков, А.А. Оценка эффективности мероприятий по интенсификации добычи нефти (на примере месторождений Соликамской депрессии) / А.А. Щербаков, Г.П. Хижняк, В.И. Галкин // Геология, геофизика и разработка нефтяных и газовых месторождений. – 2019. – № 2. – С. 70–73. DOI: 10.30713/2413-5011-2019-2-70-73 Scholar
- 7.Ерофеев, А.А. Оценка условий применения методов обработки кривых восстановления давления скважин в карбонатных коллекторах / А.А. Ерофеев, И.Н. Пономарева, М.С. Турбаков // Инженер-нефтяник. – 2011. – № 3. – С. 12–15. Scholar
- 8.Production optimization for water flooding in fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoir–From laboratory physical model to reservoir operation / B. Yang, J. He, D. Lyu, H. Tang, J. Zhang, X. Li, J. Zhao // Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. – 2020. – No. 184. – P. 106520. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106520 Scholar
- 9.Mechanistic Study and Optimization of High Water Cut Phase Management Strategies in Fracture-Vuggy Carbonate Reservoirs with Bottom Water / M. Zhao, X. Xin, G. Yu, R. Hu, Y. Gong // Processes. – 2023. – No. 11. – P. 3135. DOI: 10.3390/pr11113135 Scholar
- 10.Waterflooding in giant carbonate reservoir; successes and challenges / S. Mahmood, P. Salazar, X. Zhao, M. Pointing, A. Sayed // In Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. – Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2017. DOI: 10.2118/188532-MS Scholar
- 11.Integrated Waterflooding Effect Evaluation Methodology for Carbonate Fractured-Vuggy Reservoirs Based on the Unascertained Measure–Mahalanobis Distance Theory / Z. Su, S. Gao, Z. Li, T. Li, N. Kang // Processes. – 2024. – No. 12. – P. 274. DOI: 10.3390/pr12020274 Scholar
- 12.Jiao, F. Practice and knowledge of volumetric development of deep fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs in Tarim basin NW China / F. Jiao // Petroleum Exploration and Development, – 2019. – No. 46 (3). – P. 576–582. DOI: 10.1016/S1876-3804(19)60037-6 Scholar
- 13.Dehghani, K. Modeling of waterflood in a vuggy carbonate reservoir / K. Dehghani, K.A. Edwards, P.M. Harris // In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. – San Antonio, Texas, 1997. DOI: 10.2118/38567-MS Scholar
- 14.Cho, Y. Stochastic discrete fracture network modeling in shale reservoirs via integration of seismic attributes and petrophysical data / Y. Cho // Interpretation. – 2021. – No. 9 (4). – P. SG47–SG58. DOI: 10.1190/INT-2020-0210.1 Scholar
- 15.Impact and lessons of using high permeability streaks in history matching a giant offshore Middle East carbonate reservoir / K.M. Brantferger, G.S. Kompanik, H.M. Al-Jenaibi, W.S. Dodge, H. Patel // In Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. – Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2012. DOI: 10.2118/161426-MS Scholar
- 16.High Permeability Streaks Characterisations in Middle East Carbonate / E. Poli, C. Maza, A. Virgone, F. Gisquet, C. Fraisse, P. Cecile // In Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference. – Doha, Qatar, 2009. DOI: 10.2523/IPTC-13385-ABSTRACT Scholar
- 17.Using Machine Learning to Capture High-Permeability Streaks in Reservoir Models / S. Manish Kumar, P. Humberto, E.J. Obeida, B.J. Houcine, K.K. Chakib, M. Hussein // In Proceedings of the ADIPEC. – Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2022. DOI: 10.2118/211661-MS Scholar
- 18.A systematic review of data science and machine learning applications to the oil and gas industry / Z. Tariq, M.S. Aljawad, A. Hasan, M. Murtaza, E. Mohammed, A. El Husseiny, S. Alarifi, M. Mahmoud, A. Abdulraheem // Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. – 2021. – No. 11. – P. 4339–4374. DOI: 10.1007/s13202-021-01302-2 Scholar
- 19.Choubey, S. Artificial intelligence techniques and their application in oil and gas industry / S. Choubey, G.P. Karmakar // Artificial Intelligence Review. – 2021. – No. 54 (5). – P. 3665–3683. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-020-09935-1 Scholar
- 20.An Anomaly Detection Model for Oil and Gas Pipelines Using Machine Learning / S.S. Aljameel, D.M. Alomari, S. Alismail, F. Khawaher, A.A. Alkhudhair, F. Aljubran, R.M. Alzannan // Computation. – 2022. – No. 10. – P. 138. DOI: 10.3390/computation10080138 Scholar
- 21.Application of machine learning and artificial intelligence in oil and gas industry / A. Sircar, K. Yadav, K. Rayavarapu, N. Bist, H. Oza // Petroleum Research. – 2021. – No. 6 (4). – P. 379–391. DOI: 10.1016/j.ptlrs.2021.05.009 Scholar
- 22.Fluid and lithofacies prediction based on integration of well-log data and seismic inversion: A machine-learning approach / L. Zhao, C.Zou, Y. Chen, W. Shen, Y. Wang, H. Chen, J. Geng // Geophysics. – 2021. – No. 86 (4). – P. M151–M165. DOI: 10.1190/geo2020-0521.1 Scholar
- 23.Machine learning based fluids and lithofacies prediction based on the integration of well logging data and seismic inversion / C. Zou, L. Zhao, Y. Chen, Y. Wang // In Proceedings of the SEG 2020 Workshop: 2nd SEG Borehole Geophysics. – 2020. DOI: 2020.10.1190/bhgp2020-32.1 Scholar
- 24.Talebkeikhah, M. A comparison of machine learning approaches for prediction of permeability using well log data in the hydrocarbon reservoirs / M. Talebkeikhah, Z. Sadeghtabaghi, M. Shabani // Journal of Human, Earth, and Future. – 2021. – No. 2. – P. 82–99. DOI: 10.28991/HEF-2021-02-02-01 Scholar
- 25.Wood, D.A. Predicting porosity, permeability and water saturation applying an optimized nearest-neighbour, machine-learning and data-mining network of well-log data / D.A. Wood // Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. – 2020. – No. 184. – P. 106587. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106587 Scholar
- 26.Miah, M.I. Log data-driven model and feature ranking for water saturation prediction using machine learning approach / M.I. Miah, S. Zendehboudi, S. Ahmed // Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. – 2020. – No. 194. – P. 107291. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107291 Scholar
- 27.Bestagini, P. A machine learning approach to facies classification using well logs / P. Bestagini, V. Lipari, S. Tubaro // In Proceedings of the SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting. – Houston, Texas, 2017. DOI: 10.1190/segam2017-17729805.1 Scholar
- 28.Salehi, S.M. Automatic identification of formation iithology from well log data: a machine learning approach / S.M. Salehi, B. Honarvar // Journal of Petroleum Science Research. – 2014. – No. 3. – P. 73–82. DOI: 10.14355/jpsr.2014.0302.04 Scholar
- 29.Well-Logging based lithology prediction using Machine Learning / Y. Meshalkin, A. Shakirov, D. Orlov, D. Koroteev // Data Science in Oil & Gas. – 2020. – No. 2020 (1). – P. 1–5. DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.202054010 Scholar
- 30.A machine-learning-based approach to assistive well-log correlation / S. Brazell, A.C. Bayeh, M. Ashby, D. Burton // Petrophysics. – 2019. – No. 60 (4). – P. 469–479. DOI: 10.30632/PJV60N4-2019a1 Scholar
- 31.Application of Machine Learning for Lithofacies Prediction and Cluster Analysis Approach to Identify Rock Type / M. Hussain, S. Liu, U. Ashraf, M. Ali, W. Hussain, N. Ali, A. Anees // Energies. – 2022. – No. 15. – P. 4501. DOI: 10.3390/en15124501 Scholar
- 32.Permeability Prediction Using Rock-Typing, Flow Zone Indicator and Machine Learning Techniques in a Brownfield Offshore Malaysia / B. Kantaatmadja, F. Kasim, W.N.S. Zainudin, E. Elsebakhi, E. Jr, A. Ali // In Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Virtual. – 2021. DOI: 10.2523/IPTC-21436-MS Scholar
- 33.Al Khalifah, H. Permeability prediction and diagenesis in tight carbonates using machine learning techniques / H. Al Khalifah, P.W.J. Glover, P. Lorinczi // Marine and Petroleum Geology. – 2020. – No. 112. – P. 104096. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104096 Scholar
- 34.Alameedy, U.S. Evaluating machine learning techniques for carbonate formation permeability prediction using well log data / U.S. Alameedy, A.T. Almomen, N. Abd // The Iraqi Geological Journal. – 2023. – No. 56. – P. 175–187. DOI: 10.46717/igj.56.1D.14ms-2023-4-23 Scholar
- 35.High Permeability Streak Identification and Modelling Approach for Carbonate Reef Reservoir / D. Shirinkin, A. Kochnev, S. Krivoshchekov, I. Putilov, A. Botalov, N. Kozyrev, E. Ozhgibesov // Energies. – 2024. – No. 17. – P. 236. DOI: 10.3390/en17010236 Scholar
- 36.Application of gradient boosting regression model for the evaluation of feature selection techniques in improving reservoir characterisation predictions / D. Otchere, T. Ganat, J. Ojero, B.N. Tackie-Otoo, M. Taki // Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. – 2022. – No. 208. – P. 109244. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109244 Scholar
- 37.Abbas, M.A. Improving permeability prediction in carbonate reservoirs through gradient boosting hyperparameter tuning / M.A. Abbas, W.J. Al-Mudhafar, D.A. Wood // Earth Science Informatics. – 2023. – No. 16 (4). – P. 3417–3432. DOI: 10.1007/s12145-023-01099-0 Scholar
- 38.Rahimi, M. Reservoir facies classification based on random forest and geostatistics methods in an offshore oilfield / M. Rahimi, M.A. Riahi // Journal of Applied Geophysics. – 2022. – No. 201. – P. 104640. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104640 Scholar
- 39.Amagada, P.U. An Inferable Machine Learning Approach for Reservoir Lithology Characterization Using Drilling Data / P.U. Amagada // In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. – San Antonio, Texas, USA, 2023. DOI: 10.2118/217485-STU Scholar
- 40.A systematic machine learning method for reservoir identification and production prediction / W. Liu, Z. Chen, Y. Hu, L. Xu // Petroleum Science. – 2023. – No. 20 (1). – P. 295–308. DOI: 10.1016/j.petsci.2022.09.002 Scholar
- 41.Li, W. Machine learning and data analytics for geoscience applications—Introduction / W. Li, W. Hu, A. Abubakar // Geophysics. – 2020. – No. 85 (4). – P. WAi–WAii. DOI: 10.1190/geo2020-0518-spseintro.1 Scholar
- 42.A mini-review of machine learning in big data analytics: Applications, challenges, and prospects / I.K. Nti, J.A. Quarcoo, J. Aning, G.K. Fosu // Big Data Mining and Analytics. – 2022. – No. 5 (2). – P. 81–97. DOI: 10.26599/BDMA.2021.9020028 Scholar
- 43.Maganathan T., Senthilkumar S., Balakrishnan V. Machine learning and data analytics for environmental science: a Review, Prospects and Challenges / T. Maganathan, S. Senthilkumar, V. Balakrishnan // IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. – 2020. – No. 955 (1). – P. 012107. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/955/1/012107 Scholar
- 44.Enhanced Reservoir Description: Using Core and Log Data to identify Hydraulic (Flow) Units and Predict Permeability in Uncored Intervals/Wells / J.O. Amaefule, M. Altunbay, D. Tiab, D. Kersey, D. Keelan // In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. – Houston, Texas, 1993. DOI: 10.2118/26436-MS Scholar
- 45.Garrouch, A.A. Exploring the link between the flow zone indicator and key open-hole log measurements: An application of dimensional analysis / A.A. Garrouch, A.A. Al-Sultan // Petroleum geoscience. – 2019. – No. 25. – P. 219–234. DOI: 10.1144/petgeo2018-035 Scholar
- 1.Janjuhah H.T., Salim A.M.A., Ghosh D., Wahid A. Diagenetic process and their effect on reservoir quality in Miocene carbonate reservoir Offshore, Sarawak, Malaysia. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Integrated Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences. Singapore, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-3650-7_48 Scholar
- 2.Farzaneh S.A., Dehghan A.A., Lakzaie A. Using diagenetic processes in facies modeling of a carbonate reservoir. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2013, no. 35 (6), pp. 516-528. DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2010.504946 Scholar
- 3.Riabokon E., Turbakov M., Kozhevnikov E., Poplygin V., Guzev M. Study of the influence of nonlinear dynamic loads on elastic modulus of carbonate reservoir rocks. Energies, 2021, vol. 14, no. 24. DOI 10.3390/en14248559 Scholar
- 4.Huang Q., Liu W., Zhang Y., Shi S., Wang K. Progress of research on dolomitization and dolomite reservoir. Advances in Earth Science, 2015, no. 30 (5), 539 p. DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.05.0539 Scholar
- 5.Xu Z.X., Li S.Y., Li B.F., Chen D.Q., Liu Z.Y., Li Z.M. A review of development methods and EOR technologies for carbonate reservoirs. Petroleum Science, 2020, no. 17, pp. 990-1013. DOI: 10.1007/s12182-020-00467-5. Scholar
- 6.Shcherbakov A.A., Khizhniak G.P., Galkin V.I. Otsenka effektivnosti meropriiatii po intensifikatsii dobychi nefti (na primere mestorozhdenii Solikamskoi depressii) [Effectiveness evaluation of oil production stimulation measures (on the example of the Solikamsk depression fields)]. Geologiia, geofizika i razrabotka neftianykh i gazovykh mestorozhdenii, 2019, no. 2, pp. 70-73. DOI: 10.30713/2413-5011-2019-2-70-73 Scholar
- 7.Erofeev A.A., Ponomareva I.N., Turbakov M.S. Otsenka uslovii primeneniia metodov obrabotki krivykh vosstanovleniia davleniia skvazhin v karbonatnykh kollektorakh [Evaluation of the application conditions for methods of processing well pressure recovery curves in carbonate reservoirs]. Inzhener-neftianik, 2011, no. 3, pp. 12-15. Scholar
- 8.Yang B., He J., Lyu D., Tang H., Zhang J., Li X., Zhao J. Production optimization for water flooding in fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoir-From laboratory physical model to reservoir operation. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, no. 184, 106520 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106520 Scholar
- 9.Zhao M., Xin X., Yu G., Hu R., Gong Y. Mechanistic Study and Optimization of High Water Cut Phase Management Strategies in Fracture-Vuggy Carbonate Reservoirs with Bottom Water. Processes, 2023, no. 11, 3135 p. DOI: 10.3390/pr11113135 Scholar
- 10.Mahmood S., Salazar P., Zhao X., Pointing M., Sayed A. Waterflooding in giant carbonate reservoir; successes and challenges. In Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2017. DOI: 10.2118/188532-MS Scholar
- 11.Su Z., Gao S., Li Z., Li T., Kang N. Integrated Waterflooding Effect Evaluation Methodology for Carbonate Fractured-Vuggy Reservoirs Based on the Unascertained Measure-Mahalanobis Distance Theory. Processes, 2024, no. 12, 274 p. DOI: 10.3390/pr12020274 Scholar
- 12.Jiao F. Practice and knowledge of volumetric development of deep fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs in Tarim basin NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, no. 46 (3), pp. 576-582. DOI: 10.1016/S1876-3804(19)60037-6 Scholar
- 13.Dehghani K., Edwards K.A., Harris P.M. Modeling of waterflood in a vuggy carbonate reservoir. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 1997. DOI: 10.2118/38567-MS Scholar
- 14.Cho Y. Stochastic discrete fracture network modeling in shale reservoirs via integration of seismic attributes and petrophysical data. Interpretation, 2021, no. 9 (4), pp. SG47-SG58. DOI: 10.1190/INT-2020-0210.1 Scholar
- 15.Brantferger K.M., Kompanik G.S., Al-Jenaibi H.M., Dodge W.S., Patel H. Impact and lessons of using high permeability streaks in history matching a giant offshore Middle East carbonate reservoir. In Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2012. DOI: 10.2118/161426-MS Scholar
- 16.Poli E., Maza C., Virgone A., Gisquet F., Fraisse C., Cecile P. High Permeability Streaks Characterisations in Middle East Carbonate. In Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference. Doha, Qatar, 2009. DOI: 10.2523/IPTC-13385-ABSTRACT Scholar
- 17.Manish Kumar S., Humberto P., Obeida E.J., Houcine B.J., Chakib K.K., Hussein M. Using Machine Learning to Capture High-Permeability Streaks in Reservoir Models. In Proceedings of the ADIPEC. Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2022. DOI: 10.2118/211661-MS Scholar
- 18.Tariq Z., Aljawad M.S., Hasan A., Murtaza M., Mohammed E., El Husseiny A., Alarifi S., M. Mahmoud, A. Abdulraheem A systematic review of data science and machine learning applications to the oil and gas industry. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2021, no. 11, pp. 4339-4374. DOI: 10.1007/s13202-021-01302-2 Scholar
- 19.Choubey S., Karmakar G.P. Artificial intelligence techniques and their application in oil and gas industry. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2021, no. 54 (5), pp. 3665-3683. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-020-09935-1 Scholar
- 20.Aljameel S.S., Alomari D.M., Alismail S., Khawaher F., Alkhudhair A.A., Aljubran F., Alzannan R.M. An Anomaly Detection Model for Oil and Gas Pipelines Using Machine Learning. Computation, 2022, no. 10, 138 p. DOI: 10.3390/computation10080138 Scholar
- 21.Sircar A., Yadav K., Rayavarapu K., Bist N., Oza H. Application of machine learning and artificial intelligence in oil and gas industry. Petroleum Research, 2021, no. 6 (4), pp. 379-391. DOI: 10.1016/j.ptlrs.2021.05.009 Scholar
- 22.Zhao L., Zou C., Chen Y., Shen W., Wang Y., Chen H., Geng J. Fluid and lithofacies prediction based on integration of well-log data and seismic inversion: A machinelearning approach. Geophysics, 2021, no. 86 (4), pp. M151-M165. DOI: 10.1190/geo2020-0521.1 Scholar
- 23.Zou C., Zhao L., Chen Y., Wang Y. Machine learning based fluids and lithofacies prediction based on the integration of well logging data and seismic inversion. In Proceedings of the SEG 2020 Workshop: 2nd SEG Borehole Geophysics, 2020. DOI: 2020.10.1190/bhgp2020-32.1 Scholar
- 24.Talebkeikhah M., Sadeghtabaghi Z., Shabani M. A comparison of machine learning approaches for prediction of permeability using well log data in the hydrocarbon reservoirs. Journal of Human, Earth, and Future, 2021, no. 2, pp. 82-99. DOI: 10.28991/HEF-2021-02-02-01 Scholar
- 25.Wood D.A. Predicting porosity, permeability and water saturation applying an optimized nearest-neighbour, machine-learning and data-mining network of well-log data. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, no. 184, 106587 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106587 Scholar
- 26.Miah M.I., Zendehboudi S., Ahmed S. Log data-driven model and feature ranking for water saturation prediction using machine learning approach. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, no. 194, 107291 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107291 Scholar
- 27.Bestagini P., Lipari V., Tubaro S. A machine learning approach to facies classification using well logs. In Proceedings of the SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting. Houston, Texas, 2017. DOI: 10.1190/segam2017-17729805.1 Scholar
- 28.Salehi S.M., Honarvar B. Automatic identification of formation iithology from well log data: a machine learning approach. Journal of Petroleum Science Research 2014, no. 3, pp. 73-82. DOI: 10.14355/jpsr.2014.0302.04 Scholar
- 29.Meshalkin Y., Shakirov A., Orlov D., Koroteev D. Well-Logging based lithology prediction using Machine Learning. Data Science in Oil & Gas, 2020, no. 2020 (1), pp. 1-5. DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.202054010 Scholar
- 30.Brazell S., Bayeh A.C., Ashby M., Burton D. A machine-learning-based approach to assistive well-log correlation. Petrophysics, 2019, no. 60 (4), pp. 469-479. DOI: 10.30632/PJV60N4-2019a1 Scholar
- 31.Hussain M., Liu S., Ashraf U., Ali M., Hussain W., Ali N., Anees A. Application of Machine Learning for Lithofacies Prediction and Cluster Analysis Approach to Identify Rock Type. Energies, 2022, no. 15, 4501 p. DOI: 10.3390/en15124501 Scholar
- 32.Kantaatmadja B., Kasim F., Zainudin W.N.S., Elsebakhi E., Jr E., Ali A. Permeability Prediction Using Rock-Typing, Flow Zone Indicator and Machine Learning Techniques in a Brownfield Offshore Malaysia. In Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Virtual, 2021. DOI: 10.2523/IPTC-21436-MS Scholar
- 33.Al Khalifah H., Glover P.W.J., Lorinczi P. Permeability prediction and diagenesis in tight carbonates using machine learning techniques. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, no. 112, 104096 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104096 Scholar
- 34.Alameedy U.S., Almomen A.T., Abd N. Evaluating machine learning techniques for carbonate formation permeability prediction using well log data. The Iraqi Geological Journal, 2023, no. 56, pp. 175-187. DOI: 10.46717/igj.56.1D.14ms-2023-4-23 Scholar
- 35.Shirinkin D., Kochnev A., Krivoshchekov S., Putilov I., Botalov A., Kozyrev N., Ozhgibesov E. High Permeability Streak Identification and Modelling Approach for Carbonate Reef Reservoir. Energies, 2024, no. 17, 236 p. DOI: 10.3390/en17010236 Scholar
- 36.Otchere D., Ganat T., Ojero J., Tackie-Otoo B.N., Taki M. Application of gradient boosting regression model for the evaluation of feature selection techniques in improving reservoir characterisation predictions. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, No. 208, 109244 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109244 Scholar
- 37.Abbas M.A., Al-Mudhafar W.J., Wood D.A. Improving permeability prediction in carbonate reservoirs through gradient boosting hyperparameter tuning. Earth Science Informatics, 2023, no. 16 (4), pp. 3417-3432. DOI: 10.1007/s12145-023-01099-0 Scholar
- 38.Rahimi M., Riahi M.A. Reservoir facies classification based on random forest and geostatistics methods in an offshore oilfield. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2022, no. 201, 104640 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104640 Scholar
- 39.Amagada P.U. An Inferable Machine Learning Approach for Reservoir Lithology Characterization Using Drilling Data. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. San Antonio, Texas, USA, 2023. DOI: 10.2118/217485-STU Scholar
- 40.Liu W., Chen Z., Hu Y., Xu L. A systematic machine learning method for reservoir identification and production prediction. Petroleum Science, 2023, no. 20 (1), pp. 295-308. DOI: 10.1016/j.petsci.2022.09.002 Scholar
- 41.Li W., Hu W., Abubakar A. Machine learning and data analytics for geoscience applications - Introduction. Geophysics, 2020, no. 85 (4), pp. WAi-WAii. DOI: 10.1190/geo2020-0518-spseintro.1 Scholar
- 42.Nti I.K., Quarcoo J.A., Aning J., Fosu G.K. A mini-review of machine learning in big data analytics: Applications, challenges, and prospects. Big Data Mining and Analytics, 2022, no. 5 (2), pp. 81-97. DOI: 10.26599/BDMA.2021.9020028 Scholar
- 43.Maganathan T., Senthilkumar S., Balakrishnan V. Machine learning and data analytics for environmental science: a Review, Prospects and Challenges. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, no. 955 (1), 012107 p. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/955/1/012107 Scholar
- 44.Amaefule J.O., Altunbay M., Tiab D., Kersey D., Keelan D. Enhanced Reservoir Description: Using Core and Log Data to identify Hydraulic (Flow) Units and Predict Permeability in Uncored Intervals/Wells. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Houston, Texas, 1993. DOI: 10.2118/26436-MS Scholar
- 45.Garrouch A.A., Al-Sultan A.A. Exploring the link between the flow zone indicator and key open-hole log measurements: An application of dimensional analysis. Petroleum geoscience, 2019, no. 25, pp. 219-234. DOI: 10.1144/petgeo2018-035 Scholar
Другие статьи выпуска
Весь выпуск (Том 25, № 1, 2025)- Оптимизация алгоритма поиска наиболее достоверных реализаций геологической моделис. 1–8
- Инженерно-геокриологический мониторинг многолетнемерзлых пород для обеспечения безопасности эксплуатации морского нефтеналивного комплекса в Арктикес. 21–26
- Циклические нагрузки и фильтрационные свойства пористых горных пород: экспериментальные исследованияс. 27–35
- Гидрофилизация коллекторской поверхности в процессах воздействия на призабойную зону пластас. 36–46
- Определение оптимального соотношения закачки флюидов при водогазовом воздействиис. 47–51
- Влияние секвестрации углерода в горных породах на изменение фильтрационных и механических характеристик пласта при доизвлечении запасов нефтис. 52–58
Информация о статье
- Опубликована
- 24.02.2025
- В выпуске
- 24.02.2025
- Выпуск
- Том 25, № 1 (2025)