Анализ и снижение неопределенности параметра проницаемости при моделировании карбонатного резервуара

Козырев, Н.Д.; Кривощеков, С.Н.; Кочнев, А.А.; Ожгибесов, Е.С.; Чалова, П.О.; Боталов, А.Н.

doi:10.15593/2712-8008/2024.1.3

Анализ и снижение неопределенности параметра проницаемости при моделировании карбонатного резервуара

Н.Д. Козырев, С.Н. Кривощеков, А.А. Кочнев, Е.С. Ожгибесов, П.О. Чалова, А.Н. Боталов

Сведения об авторах

Н.Д. Козырев
Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет, Пермь, Россия
С.Н. Кривощеков
Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет, Пермь, Россия
А.А. Кочнев
Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет, Пермь, Россия
Е.С. Ожгибесов
Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет, Пермь, Россия
П.О. Чалова
Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет, Пермь, Россия
А.Н. Боталов
Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет, Пермь, Россия

https://doi.org/10.15593/2712-8008/2024.1.3

Анализируется проблема изменчивости абсолютной проницаемости карбонатного сложнопостроенного коллектора в вертикальном и латеральном направлениях. В рамках работы проведен детальный анализ всего имеющегося кернового материала изучаемого карбонатного объекта. По результатам исследований полноразмерных образцов керна установлено, что изменчивость абсолютной проницаемости зависит от типа карбонатной породы, которая может быть осложнена вторичными изменениями, такими как наличие трещиноватости и кавернозности. Описанный в данной работе методический подход позволил произвести типизацию сложнопостроенного карбонатного коллектора, выделяя несколько типов плотных, низкопористых, пористых, кавернозно-пористых, трещиноватых пород. Выявлено, что каждый тип карбонатного коллектора имеет определенную корреляцию с параметром проницаемости и ее изменчивости в различных направлениях пласта. Установлено, что доля типов карбонатного коллектора значительно отличается от скважины к скважине, следовательно, данный факт оказывает влияние на фильтрационные процессы, на степень и равномерность выработки, а также на темпы обводнения скважин. Следующим этапом работы осуществлен учет изменчивости параметра проницаемости в действующей геолого-гидродинамической модели изучаемого объекта путем создания кубов абсолютной проницаемости в направлениях Y и Z через систему множителей согласно выявленным корреляционным зависимостям. Оценка эффективности представленного метода типизации и учета изменчивости проницаемости осуществлена путем сопоставления результатов моделирования с фактическими промысловыми данными. Всего рассмотрено два варианта реализации геолого-гидродинамической модели продуктивного карбонатного пласта. Первый вариант модели подразумевает стандартный способ создания, второй вариант соответствует разработанному методическому подходу. При сопоставлении выявлено, что геолого-гидродинамическая модель, созданная с учетом типизации и соответствующей ей изменчивости, с более высокой точностью воспроизводит фактическую добычу.

Ключевые слова

абсолютная проницаемостьсложнопостроенный карбонатный коллекторизменчивость абсолютной проницаемоститипизация карбонатного коллекторагеолого-гидродинамическое моделированиепетрофизическая зависимость

Analysis and Reduction of Permeability Parameter Uncertainty in Carbonate Reservoir Modeling

The problem of variability of the absolute permeability of a carbonate complex reservoir in the vertical and lateral directions was analyzed. As part of the work, a detailed analysis of all available core material of the studied carbonate object was carried out. Based on the results of full-size core studies, it was established that the absolute permeability variability depends on the carbonate rock type, which could be complicated by secondary changes, such as the presence of fracturing and vugginess. The methodological approach described in this work made it possible to typify a complex carbonate reservoir, identifying several types of dense, low-porosity, porous, cavernous-porous, and fractured rocks. It was revealed that each type of carbonate reservoir had a certain correlation with the permeability parameter and its variability in different directions of the formation. It was established that the proportion of carbonate reservoir types differed significantly from well to well, therefore, this fact affected filtration processes, the degree and uniformity of production, as well as the rate of well watering. The next stage of the work took into account the variability of the permeability parameter in the current geological-hydrodynamic model of the studied object by creating cubes of absolute permeability in the Y and Z directions through a system of multipliers according to the identified correlation dependencies. The effectiveness of the presented method for typing and accounting for permeability variability was assessed by comparing modeling results with actual field data. In total, two options for implementing the geological-hydrodynamic model of a productive carbonate reservoir were considered. The first version of the model implied a standard method of creation, the second option corresponded to the developed methodological approach. When compared, it was revealed that the geological and hydrodynamic model, created taking into account typification and the corresponding variability, reproduced actual production with higher accuracy.

Keywords

absolute permeabilitycomplex carbonate reservoirvariability of absolute permeabilitycarbonate reservoir typificationgeological and hydrodynamic modelingpetrophysical dependence

Литература

1.Гареева, А.А. Значение геолого-гидродинамического моделирования при разработке и эксплуатации нефтяных и газовых месторождений / А.А. Гареева // Актуальные исследования. – 2020. – №. 22. – С. 68–70. Scholar
2.Optimisation of decision making under uncertainty throughout field lifetime: A fractured reservoir example / D. Arnold, V. Demyanov, M. Christie, A. Bakay, K. Gopa // Computers & Geosciences. – 2016. – Vol. 95. – P. 123–139. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2016.07.011 Scholar
3.Козырев, Н.Д. Оценка влияния параметров неопределенности на прогнозирование показателей разработки / Н.Д. Козырев, А.Ю. Вишняков, И.С. Путилов // Недропользование. – 2020. – Т. 20, № 4. – С. 356–368. DOI: 10.15593/2712-8008/2020.4.5 Scholar
4.Mogensen, K. A review of EOR techniques for carbonate reservoirs in challenging geological settings / K. Mogensen, S. Masalmeh // Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. – 2020. – Vol. 195. – P. 107889. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107889 Scholar
5.Advances and challenges in CO2 foam technologies for enhanced oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs / G. Jian [et al.] // Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. – 2021. – Vol. 202. – P. 108447. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108447 Scholar
6.High-resolution sequence stratigraphy applied to reservoir zonation and characterisation, and its impact on production performance-shallow marine, fluvial downstream, and lacustrine carbonate settings / A.J.C. Magalhães [et al.] // Earth-Science Reviews. – 2020. – Vol. 210. – P. 103325. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103325 Scholar
7.Accurate determination of permeability in carbonate reservoirs using Gaussian Process Regression / M. Mahdaviara, A. Rostami, F. Keivanimehr, K. Shahbazi // Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. – 2021. – Vol. 196. – P. 107807. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107807 Scholar
8.Quantitative evaluation of the carbonate reservoir heterogeneity based on production dynamic data: A case study from Cretaceous Mishrif formation in Halfaya oilfield, Iraq / R. Li [et al.] // Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. – 2021. – Vol. 206. – P. 109007. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109007 Scholar
9.Tadayoni, M. A new approach to heterogeneity analysis in a highly complex carbonate reservoir by using borehole image and conventional log data / M. Tadayoni, M. Khalilbeyg, R. Bin Junin // Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. – 2020. – Vol. 10. – P. 2613–2629. DOI: 10.1007/s13202-020-00930-4 Scholar
10.Pore-scale dual-porosity and dual-permeability modeling in an exposed multi-facies porous carbonate reservoir / M. Zambrano [et al.] // Marine and Petroleum Geology. – 2021. – Vol. 128. – P. 105004. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105004 Scholar
11.Kargarpour, M.A. Carbonate reservoir characterization: an integrated approach / M.A. Kargarpour // Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. – 2020. – Vol. 10, № 7. – P. 2655–2667. Scholar
12.Analysis and Application of Fractured Carbonate Dual-Media Composite Reservoir Model / H. Song [et al.] // Geofluids. – 2022. – Vol. 2022. – P. 6785373. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6785373 Scholar
13.Geology driven history matching / G. Eremyan, V. Demyanov, O. Popova, S. Kaygorodov, M. Korovin // In proceedings of the SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference. – January 2019. DOI:10.2118/196881-RU Scholar
14.Benetatos, C. Coping with uncertainties through an automated workflow for 3D reservoir modelling of carbonate reservoirs / C. Benetatos, G. Giglio // Geoscience frontiers. – 2021. – Т. 12, № 6. – P. 100913. DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2019.11.008 Scholar
15.Рясной, А.А. Влияние вторичных процессов на коллекторские свойства карбонатных пород верейского нефтегазоносного комплекса (Северо-Запад Республики Башкортостан) / А.А. Рясной, Е.Н. Савельева // Регион. геология и металлогения. – 2019. – № 77. – С. 27–39. Scholar
16.Тугарова, М.А. Вторичные изменения карбонатных пород нефтегазоносных комплексов / М.А. Тугарова // PROнефть. Профессионально о нефти. – 2020. – № 4(18). – С. 18–23. DOI 10.7868/S2587739920040023. Scholar
17.Abdulaziz, A.M. Prediction of carbonate diagenesis from well logs using artificial neural network: An innovative technique to understand complex carbonate systems / A.M. Abdulaziz, S.S. Hawary // Ain Shams Engineering Journal. – 2020. – Vol. 11, № 4. – P. 1387–1401. DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.01.010 Scholar
18.Qualitative and quantitative diagenetic modelling in a tight carbonate reservoir in north-western Iraq / O.K. Mohammed-Sajed, W.J. Glover, F.H. Al-Khatony, R.E. Collier // Geoenergy Science and Engineering. – 2024. – Vol. 232. – P. 212450. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212450 Scholar
19.Depositional and diagenetic impacts on the porosity of post-salt carbonate reservoirs of southern Campos Basin, southeastern Brazilian margin / G. Armelenti [et al.] // Journal of South American Earth Sciences. – 2021. – Vol. 112. – P. 103566. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103566 Scholar
20.Martyushev, D.A. Improving the geological and hydrodynamic model of a carbonate oil object by taking into account the permeability anisotropy parameter / D.A. Martyushev // Journal of Mining Institute. – 2020. – Vol. 243. – P. 313–318. Scholar
21.Azimuthal Investigation of a Fractured Carbonate Reservoir / F. Bouchaala [et al.] // SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering. – 2023. – Vol. 26, № 03. – P. 813–826. DOI: 10.2118/212873-PA Scholar
22.Three-dimensional modeling and fluid flow simulation for the quantitative description of permeability anisotropy in tidal flat carbonate / H.A. Eltom [et al.] // Energies. – 2020. – Vol. 13, № 21. – P. 5557. DOI: 10.3390/en13215557 Scholar
23.A novel neural network for seismic anisotropy and fracture porosity measurements in carbonate reservoirs / Y. Ding [et al.] // Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. – 2021. – P. 1–23. Scholar
24.Seismic Anisotropic Fluid Identification in Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs / X. Guo [et al.] // Energies. – 2022. – Vol. 15, № 19. – P. 7184. DOI: 10.3390/en15197184 Scholar
25.Aljawad, M.S. Permeability anisotropy impact on wormhole propagation in openhole and limited-entry completions: A 3D numerical study / M.S. Aljawad // Gas Science and Engineering. – 2023. – P. 205050. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgsce.2023.205050 Scholar
26.Factoring Permeability Anisotropy in Complex Carbonate Reservoirs in Selecting an Optimum Field Development Strategy / S. Krivoshchekov, A. Kochnev, N. Kozyrev, E. Ozhgibesov // Energies. – 2022. – Vol. 15, № 23. – P. 8866 DOI: 10.3390/en15238866 Scholar
27.Vertical Interference Testing as a Gateway to Permeability Anisotropy Demystification and Understanding Fluid Displacement in Carbonates / V.K. Pandey [et al.] // SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition. – SPE, 2023. DOI: 10.2118/212646-MS Scholar
28.Менгалиев, А.Г. Учет параметра анизотропии проницаемости в геолого-гидродинамических моделях карбонатных объектов (на примере Гагаринского месторождения) / А.Г. Менгалиев, Д.А. Мартюшев // Известия Томского политехнического университета. Инжиниринг георесурсов. – 2020. – Т. 331, №. 5. – С. 7–17. DOI: 10.18799/24131830/2020/5/2632 Scholar
29.Marion, D. Estimation of Reservoir Anisotropy From Production Data / D. Marion, H.J. Gonzalez, P.B. Crawford // J. Pet. Technol. – 1962. – Vol. 14. – P. 909–912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/97-PA Scholar
30.Shedid, H. Prediction of vertical permeability and reservoir anisotropy using coring data / H. Shedid // Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. – 2019. – Vol. 9. – P. 2139–2143. DOI: 10.1007/s13202-019-0614-0 Scholar
31.Petrophysical assessment and permeability modeling utilizing core data and machine learning approaches–a study from the Badr El Din-1 field, Egypt / S. Farouk [et al.] // Marine and Petroleum Geology. – 2021. – Vol. 133. – P. 105265. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105265 Scholar
32.Al-Dujaili, A.N. Identification of the best correlations of permeability anisotropy for Mishrif reservoir in West Qurna/1 oil Field, Southern Iraq / A.N. Al-Dujaili, M. Shabani, M.S. AL-Jawad // Egyptian Journal of Petroleum. – 2021. – Vol. 30, № 3. – P. 27–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpe.2021.06.001 Scholar
33.Sinan, S. Modelling the Impact of Anisotropy on Hydrocarbon Production in Heterogeneous Reservoirs / S. Sinan, P.W.J. Glover, P. Lorinczi // Transp. Porous. Med. – 2020. Vol. 133. – P. 413–436. DOI: 10.1007/s11242-020-01430-z Scholar
34.Investigation of static and dynamic bulk moduli in a carbonate field / J. Sharifi [et al.] // Exploration Geophysics. – 2021. – Vol. 52, № 1. – P. 16-41. DOI: 10.1080/08123985.2020.1756693 Scholar
35.Баюк, И.О. Проблемы петроупругого моделирования трещиноватых коллекторов / И.О. Баюк, Н.В. Дубиня, С.А. Тихоцкий // PROНЕФТЬ. Профессионально о нефти. – 2022. – №. 3. – С. 11–17. DOI: 10.24887/2587-7399-2019-3-11-17 Scholar
36.Realistic permeability distributions in faults and sediments: The key to predicting fluid flow in sedimentary basins / H.A. Sheldon [et al.] // Basin Research. – 2023. – Vol. 35, № 6. – P. 2118–2139. DOI: 10.1111/bre.12792 Scholar
37.The open porous media flow reservoir simulator / A.F. Rasmussen [et al.] // Computers & Mathematics with Applications. – 2021. – Vol. 81. – P. 159–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2020.05.014 Scholar
38.Advanced petroleum reservoir simulation: Towards developing reservoir emulators / M.R. Islam [et al.]. – John Wiley & Sons, 2016. DOI: 10.1002/9781119038573 Scholar
39.Lucia, F.J. Carbonate reservoir characterization / F.J. Lucia, C. Kerans, J.W. Jennings Jr // Journal of Petroleum Technology. – 2003. – Vol. 55, № 06. – P. 70–72. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72742-2 Scholar
40.Martin, A.J. Characterization of petrophysical flow units in carbonate reservoirs / A.J. Martin, S.T. Solomon, D.J. Hartmann // AAPG bulletin. – 1997. – Vol. 81, № 5. – P. 734–759. DOI: 10.1306/522B482F-1727-11D7-8645000102C1865D Scholar
41.Three-dimensional characterization of a heterogeneous carbonate reservoir / L.A. Yose [et al.] // Lower Cretaceous, Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates). – 2006. DOI: 10.1306/1215877M882562 Scholar
42.Adegbete, J.O. Investigations on the relationship among the porosity, permeability and pore throat size of transition zone samples in carbonate reservoirs using multiple regression analysis, artificial neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system / J.O. Adegbete, H. Belhaj, A. Bera // Petroleum Research. - 2021. - Vol. 6, No 4. - P. 321-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.ptlrs.2021.05.005 Scholar
43.Male, F. Lessons for machine learning from the analysis of porosity-permeability transforms for carbonate reservoirs / F. Male, L.J. Duncan // Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. - 2020. - Vol. 187. - P. 106825. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106825 Scholar
44.New wuggy porosity models-based interpretation methodology for reliable pore system characterization, Ordovician carbonate reservoirs in Tahe Oilfield, North Tarim Basin / I.A.M. Salifou [et al.] // Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. - 2021. - Vol. 196. - P. 107700. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107700 Scholar
45.A case study of petrophysical rock typing and permeability prediction using machine learning in a heterogenous carbonate reservoir in Iran / E. Mohammadian [et al.] // Scientific Reports. - 2022. - Vol. 12, No 1. - P. 4505. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08575-5 Scholar
46.Porosity and permeability prediction using pore geometry structure method on tight carbonate reservoir / B.S. Mulyanto [et al.] // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. - IOP Publishing, 2020. - Vol. 1572, No 1. - P. 012052. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1572/1/012052 Scholar
47.Репина, В.А. Применение комплексного учета петрофизических характеристик при адаптации геолого-гидродинамических моделей (на примере визиской залежи Гондыревского месторождения нефти) / В.А. Репина, В.И. Галкин, С.В. Галкин // Записки Горного института. - 2018. - Т. 231. - С. 268-274. DOI: 10.25515/PMI.2018.3.268 Scholar
48.Galkin, V.I. Study of oil recovery from reservoirs of different void types with use of multidimensional statistical analysis / V.I. Galkin, I.N. Ponomareva, V.A. Repina // Perm Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering. - 2016. - No 19. - C. 145-154. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9923/2016.19.5 Scholar

1.Gareeva A.A. Znachenie geologo-gidrodinamicheskogo modelirovaniia pri razrabotke i ekspluatatsii neftianykh i gazovykh mestorozhdenii [The importance of geological and hydrodynamic modeling in the development and operation of oil and gas fields]. Aktual'nye issledovaniia, 2020, no. 22, pp. 68-70. Scholar
2.Arnold D., Demyanov V., Christie M., Bakay A., Gopa K. Optimisation of decision making under uncertainty throughout field lifetime: A fractured reservoir example, Computers & Geosciences, 2016, vol. 95, pp. 123-139. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2016.07.011 Scholar
3.Kozyrev N.D., Vishniakov A.Iu., Putilov I.S. Otsenka vliiania parametrov neopredelennosti na prognozirovanie pokazatelei razrabotki [Assessment of the Uncertainty Parameters Influence on the Development Indicators Forecasting]. Nedropol'zovanie, 2020, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 356-368. DOI: 10.15593/2712-8008/2020.4.5 Scholar
4.Mogensen K., Masalmek S. A review of EOR techniques for carbonate reservoirs in challenging geological settings. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, vol. 195, 107889 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107889 Scholar
5.Jian G. et al. Advances and challenges in CO2 foam technologies for enhanced oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, vol. 202, 108447 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108447 Scholar
6.Magalhães A.J.C. et al. High-resolution sequence stratigraphy applied to reservoir zonation and characterisation, and its impact on production performance-shallow marine, fluvial downstream and lacustrine carbonate settings. Earth-Science Reviews, 2020, vol. 210, 103325 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103325 Scholar
7.Mahdaviar A., Rostami A., Keivanimehr F., Shahbazi K. Accurate determination of permeability in carbonate reservoirs using Gaussian Process Regression. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, vol. 196, 107807 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107807 Scholar
8.Li R. et al. Quantitative evaluation of the carbonate reservoir heterogeneity based on production dynamic data: A case study from Cretaceous Mishrif formation in Halfaya oilfield, Iraq. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, vol. 206, 109007 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109007 Scholar
9.Tadayoni M., Khalilheyd M., Bin Junin R. A new approach to heterogeneity analysis in a highly complex carbonate reservoir by using borehole image and conventional log data. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2020, vol. 10, pp. 2613-2629. DOI: 10.1007/s13202-020-00930-4 Scholar
10.Zambrano M. et al. Pore-scale dual-porosity and dual-permeability modeling in an exposed multi-facies porous carbonate reservoir. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2021, vol. 128, 105004 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105004 Scholar
11.Kargapour M.A. Carbonate reservoir characterization: an integrated approach. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2020, vol. 10, pp. 2655-2667. Scholar
12.Song H. et al. Analysis and Application of Fractured Carbonate Dual-Media Composite Reservoir Model. Geofluids, 2022, vol. 2022, 6785373 p. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6785373 Scholar
13.Eremyan G., Demyanov V., Popova O., Kaygorodov S., Korovin M. Geology driven history matching. In proceedings of the SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, January 2019. DOI:10.2118/196881-RU Scholar
14.Benetatos C., Giglio G. Coping with uncertainties through an automated workflow for 3D reservoir modelling of carbonate reservoirs. Geoscience frontiers, 2021, vol. 12, no. 6, 100913 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2019.11.008 Scholar
15.Risano A.A., Sav'el'eva E.N. Vliianie vtorichnykh protsessov na kollektorskie svoistva karbonatnykh porod vereiskogo neftegazonosnogo kompleksa (Severo-Zapad Respubliki Bostorkotstan) [Influence of secondary processes on reservoir properties of carbonate rocks in the Vereskyi oil and gas field (North-West of the Republic of Bashkortostan)]. Regional'naia geologia i metallogeniia, 2019, no. 77, pp. 27-39. Scholar
16.Tugarova M.A. Vtorichnye izmeneniiia karbonatnykh porod neftegazonosnykh kompleksov [Secondary changes in carbonate rocks of oil and gas complexes]. PROneft: Professional'no o nefti, 2020, no. 4 (18), pp. 18-23. DOI 10.7868/S2587739920040023 Scholar
17.Abdulaziz A.M., Hawary S.S. Prediction of carbonate diagenesis from well logs using artificial neural network: An innovative technique to understand complex carbonate systems. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2020, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1387-1401. DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.01.010 Scholar
18.Mohammed-Sajed O.K., Glover W.J., Al-Khatony F.H., Collier R.E. Qualitative and quantitative diagenetic modelling in a tight carbonate reservoir in north-western Iraq. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2024, vol. 232, 212450 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.geeo.2023.212450 Scholar
19.Armeltini G. et al. Depositional and diagenetic impacts on the porosity of post-salt carbonate reservoirs of southern Campos Basin, southeastern Brazilian margin. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 2021, vol. 112, 103566 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103566 Scholar
20.Martyushev D.A. Improving the geological and hydrodynamic model of a carbonate oil object by taking into account the permeability anisotropy parameter. Journal of Mining Institute, 2020, vol. 243, pp. 313-318. Scholar
21.Bouchaala F. et al. Azimuthal Investigation of a Fractured Carbonate Reservoir. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2023, vol. 26, no. 03, pp. 813-826. DOI: 10.2118/212873-PA Scholar
22.Eltom H.A. et al. Three-dimensional modeling and fluid flow simulation for the quantitative description of permeability anisotropy in tidal flat carbonate. Energies, 2020, vol. 13, no. 21, 5557 p. DOI: 10.3390/en/13215557 Scholar
23.Ding Y. et al. A novel neural network for seismic anisotropy and fracture porosity measurements in carbonate reservoirs. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2021, pp. 1-23. Scholar
24.Guo X. et al. Seismic Anisotropic Fluid Identification in Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs. Energies, 2022, vol. 15, no. 19, 7184 p. DOI: 10.3390/en/15197184 Scholar
25.Aljawad M.S. Permeability anisotropy impact on wormhole propagation in openhole and limited-entry completions: A 3D numerical study. Gas Science and Engineering, 2023, 205050 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgsce.2023.205050 Scholar
26.Krivoshchekov S., Kochnev A., Kozyrev N., Ozhgibesov E. Factoring Permeability Anisotropy in Complex Carbonate Reservoirs in Selecting an Optimum Field Development Strategy. Energies, 2022, vol. 15, no. 23, 8866 p. DOI: 10.3390/en/15238866 Scholar
27.Pandey V.K. et al. Vertical Interference Testing as a Gateway to Permeability Anisotropy Demystification and Understanding Fluid Displacement in Carbonates. SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition. SPE, 2023. DOI: 10.2118/212646-MS Scholar
28.Mengaliev A.G., Martiushev D.A. Uchet parametra anizotropii priontasemoti v geologo-gidrodinamicheskikh modelakh karbonatnykh ob'ektov (na primere Gagarinskogo mestorozhdeniia) [Accounting the parameter of anisotropy of permeability in geological Scholar
29.Marion D., Gonzalez H.J., Crawford P.B. Estimation of Reservoir Anisotropy From Production Data. J. Pet. Technol., 1962, vol. 14, pp. 909-912. DOI: 10.2118/97-PA Scholar
30.Shedid H. Prediction of vertical permeability and reservoir anisotropy using coring data. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2019, vol. 9, pp. 2139-2143. DOI: 10.1007/s13202-019-0614-0 Scholar
31.Farouk S. et al. Petrophysical assessment and permeability modeling utilizing core data and machine learning approaches-a study from the Badr El Din-1 field, Egypt. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2021, vol. 133, 105265 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105265 Scholar
32.Al-Dujaili A.N., Shabani M., AL-Jawad M.S. Identification of the best correlations of permeability anisotropy for Mishrif reservoir in West Qurna/1 oil Field, Southern Iraq. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 2021, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 27-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpe.2021.06.001 Scholar
33.Sinan S., Glover P.W.J., Lorinczi P. Modelling the Impact of Anisotropy on Hydrocarbon Production in Heterogeneous Reservoirs. Transp. Porous. Med., 2020, vol. 133, pp. 413-436. DOI: 10.1007/s11242-020-01430-z Scholar
34.Sharifi J. et al. Investigation of static and dynamic bulk moduli in a carbonate field. Exploration Geophysics, 2021, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 16-41. DOI: 10.1080/08123985.2020.1756693 Scholar
35.Baiuk I.O., Dubinia N.V., Tikhotskii S.A. Problemy petrouprugogo modelirovaniia treshchinovatykh kollektorov [Some problems of Rock-Physics modeling of fractured carbonate reservoir rocks]. PRONEFT''. Professional'no o nefti, 2022, no. 3, pp. 11-17. DOI: 10.24887/2587-7399-2019-3-11-17 Scholar
36.Sheldon H.A. et al. Realistic permeability distributions in faults and sediments: The key to predicting fluid flow in sedimentary basins. Basin Research, 2023, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 2118-2139. DOI: 10.1111/bre.12792 Scholar
37.Rasmussen A.F. et al. The open porous media flow reservoir simulator. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 2021, vol. 81, pp. 159-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2020.05.014 Scholar
38.Islam M.R. et al. Advanced petroleum reservoir simulation: Towards developing reservoir emulators. John Wiley & Sons, 2016. DOI: 10.1002/9781119038573 Scholar
39.Lucia F.J., Kerans C., Jennings J.W. Jr. Carbonate reservoir characterization. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2003, vol. 55, no. 06, pp. 70-72. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72742-2 Scholar
40.Martin A.J., Solomon S.T., Hartmann D.J. Characterization of petrophysical flow units in carbonate reservoirs. AAPG bulletin, 1997, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 734-759. DOI: 10.1306/522B482F-1727-11D7-8645000102C1865D Scholar
41.Yose L.A. et al. Three-dimensional characterization of a heterogeneous carbonate reservoir. Lower Cretaceous, Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates), 2006. DOI: 10.1306/1215877M882562 Scholar
42.Adegbite J.O., Belhaj H., Bera A. Investigations on the relationship among the porosity, permeability and pore throat size of transition zone samples in carbonate reservoirs using multiple regression analysis, artificial neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy interface system. Petroleum Research, 2021, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 321-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.ptlrs.2021.05.005 Scholar
43.Male F., Duncan I.J. Lessons for machine learning from the analysis of porosity-permeability transforms for carbonate reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, vol. 187, 106825 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106825 Scholar
44.Salifou I.A.M. et al. New vuggy porosity models-based interpretation methodology for reliable pore system characterization, Ordovician carbonate reservoirs in Tahe Oilfield, North Tarim Basin. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, vol. 196, 107700 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107700 Scholar
45.Mohammadian E. et al. A case study of petrophysical rock typing and permeability prediction using machine learning in a heterogenous carbonate reservoir in Iran. Scientific Reports, 2022, vol. 12, no. 1, 4505 p. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08575-5 Scholar
46.Mulyanto B.S. et al. Porosity and permeability prediction using pore geometry structure method on tight carbonate reservoir. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 2020, vol. 1572, no. 1, 012052 p. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1572/1/012052 Scholar
47.Repina V.A., Galkin V.I., Galkin S.V. Primenenie kompleksnogo ucheta petrofizicheskikh kharakteristik pri adaptatsii geologo-gidrodinamicheskikh modelei (na primere vizeiskoi zalezhi Gondyrevskogo mestorozhdeniia nefti) [Complex petrophysical correction in the adaptation of geological hydrodynamic models (on the example of Visean pool of Gondyrev oil field)]. Zapiski Gornogo instituta, 2018, vol. 231, pp. 268-274. DOI: 10.25515/РМI.2018.3.268 Scholar
48.Galkin V.I., Ponomareva I.N., Repina V.A. Study of oil recovery from reservoirs of different void types with use of multidimensional statistical analysis. Perm Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering, 2016, no. 19, pp. 145-154. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9923/2016.19.5 Scholar

Другие статьи выпуска

Весь выпуск (Том 24, № 1, 2024)

Скачать PDF

Информация о статье

Опубликована: 31.03.2024
В выпуске: 31.03.2024
Выпуск: Том 24, № 1 (2024)

Анализ и снижение неопределенности параметра проницаемости при моделировании карбонатного резервуара

Аннотация

Ключевые слова

Analysis and Reduction of Permeability Parameter Uncertainty in Carbonate Reservoir Modeling

Keywords

Литература

Другие статьи выпуска

Информация о статье