Development of Geostatistical Models for Assessing the Confirmability of Geomorphological Characteristics of the Geological Structures (Bashkir Svod, Perm Krai)

Author details

Abstract

Today, despite the relatively high accuracy of preparing geological structures for deep drilling in the Perm Krai using 3D seismic, there is a discrepancy between the geological and morphological characteristics of structures before drilling and according to drilling results, which makes it necessary to develop a geological and statistical approach that makes it possible to more accurately assess the risks of non-confirmation of the geological and morphological characteristics of structures prepared for deep drilling, as well as to determine the priority of objects for further geological exploration work. This work describes one of the options for developing a geological and statistical approach for rank differentiation of 25 structures of the IIК seismic reflector and 21 structures of the IIП seismic reflector, prepared by 3D seismic exploration. These structures has been already drilled by prospecting and appraisal wells within the Bashkir arch (Perm Krai). The initial data for the analysis were from the passport of structures prepared for deep drilling: the amplitude of the structure, the structure area according to the corresponding reflecting horizon, the ratio of the structure length to its width, the angle between the long axis of the structure and the axis of the nearest tectonic second order element, the distance from the structure to the edge of the nearest second order tectonic element and the distance from the structure to the center of the nearest second order tectonic element. For each model, the nature and degree of influence of the studied indicators on the confirmability of the amplitude by drilling was determined and described. The assessment of differentiation of structures by class and the accuracy of determining class boundaries were confirmed when classifying the structures of the test sample using discriminant analysis. This geological and statistical approach can be used for a more accurate assessment of the risks associated with the problem of the unconfirmability of the geological and morphological characteristics of structures prepared for deep drilling, as well as for identifying priority objects for geological exploration work, regardless of their geographical location and belonging to tectonic elements.

Keywords

geological and morphological characteristicsstructure amplitudestructures rankinggeological explorationconfirmability of structures by deep drillingrisk assessmentseismic reflectorsgeological and statistical analysisdiscriminant analysis

Bibliography

  1. 1.Galkin V.I., Rastegaev A.V., Galkin S.V. Veroiatnostno-statisticheskaia otsenka neftegazonosnosti lokal'nykh struktur [Probabilistic and statistical assessment of oil and gas potential of local structures]. Ekaterinburg, 2011, 299 p. Scholar
  2. 2.Galkin V.I., Krivoshchekov S.N. Obosnovanie napravlenii poiskov mestorozhdenii nefti i gaza v Permskom krae [Justification of directions for searching for oil and gas fields in the Perm Krai]. Nauchnye issledovaniia i innovatsii, 2009, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 3-7. Scholar
  3. 3.Galkin V.I., Kozlova I.A., Melkishev O.A., Shadrina M.A. Geokhimicheskie pokazateli ROV porod kak kriterii otsenki perspektiv neftegazonosnosti [Geochemical indicators of dispersed organic matter (DOM) of rocks as criteria of hydrocarbon potential evaluation]. Neftepromyslovoe delo, 2013, no. 9, pp. 28-31. Scholar
  4. 4.Cosentino L. Integrated reservoir studies. Paris: Editions Technip, 2001, 400 p. Scholar
  5. 5.Armstrong M. Basic Linear Geostatistics. Springer, 1998, 155 p. Scholar
  6. 6.Meisner J., Demirmen F. The creaming method: a bayesian procedure to forecast future oil and gas discoveries in mature exploration provinces. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, 1981, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 1-31. DOI: 10.2307/2982158 Scholar
  7. 7.Galkin V.I., Kozlova I.A., Krivoshchekov S.N., Piatunina E.V., Pestova S.N. O vozmozhnosti prognozirovania neftegazonosnosti famenskikh otlozhenii s pomoshch'iu postroeniia veroiatnostno-statisticheskikh modelei [On the possibility of predicting the oil and gas content of Famennian deposits using the construction of probabilistic-statistical models]. Geologiia, geofizika i razrabotka neftianykh i gazovykh mestorozhdenii, 2007, no. 10, pp. 22-27. Scholar
  8. 8.Krivoshchekov S.N., Galkin V.I. Postroenie matristy elementarnykh iachek pri prognoze neftegazonosnosti veroiatnostno-statisticheskimi metodami na territorii Permskogo kraia [Construction of a matrix of elementary cells when predicting oil and gas content using probabilistic and statistical methods in the Perm Krai]. Geologiia, geofizika i razrabotka neftianykh i gazovykh mestorozhdenii, 2008, no. 8, pp. 20-23. Scholar
  9. 9.Galkin V.I., Karaseva T.V., Kozlova I.A., Nosov M.A., Krivoshchekov S.N. Differentsirovannaiia veroiatnostnaiia otsenka generatsionnykh protsessov v otlozheniiakh domanikovogo tipa Permskogo kraia [Differentiated probabilistic assessment of the generation processes in Domanic sediments of Perm region]. Neftianoe khoziaistvo, 2014, no. 12, pp. 103-105. Scholar
  10. 10.Galkin V.I., Solov'ev S.I. Raionirovanie territorii Permskogo kraia po stepeni perspektivnosti priobreteniia neftianykh uchastkov nedr [Classification of Perm Krai areas according to prospectivity for oil fields acquisition]. Vestnik Permskogo natsional'nogo issledovatel'skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Geologiia. Neftegazovoe i gormoe delo, 2015, no. 16, pp. 14-24. DOI: 10.15593/224-9923/2015.16.2 Scholar
Download PDF

Article information

Published
25 March 2024
Issue date
25 March 2024
Issue
Vol. 23, No. 3 (2023)
Share