The Influence of Carbon Sequestration in Rocks on the Change in Filtration and Mechanical Characteristics of the Reservoir during Additional Oil Reserve Recovery

Aleksandr A. Shcherbakov, Mikhail S. Turbakov, Hongwen Jing, Liyuan Yu, Sergey G. Ashikhmin, Iuliia S. Shcherbakova

Author details

Aleksandr A. Shcherbakov
Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russian Federation
Mikhail S. Turbakov
Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russian Federation
Hongwen Jing
China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
Liyuan Yu
China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
Sergey G. Ashikhmin
Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russian Federation
Iuliia S. Shcherbakova
Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.15593/2712-8008/2025.1.7

CCUS (Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage) is becoming a key technology for achieving a significant reduction in global carbon emissions over the next century, which is why the issues of carbon sequestration in natural porous media have recently received increasing attention in the scientific community. Foreign scientists have obtained some laboratory developments, and carbon sequestration projects have already been implemented in a number of countries. For Russia, carbon sequestration in porous geological media is promising due to the significant potential of underground CO2 storage tanks, the possibility of using CO2 to enhance oil recovery, as well as the developed infrastructure of oil and gas fields. The Volga-Ural oil and gas province may become one of the promising regions for the creation of a CCUS cluster due to a combination of such factors on the territory as a significant number of CO2-emitting enterprises and a huge number of oil and gas traps potentially suitable for the use of enhanced oil recovery methods and / or CO2 disposal. The article discusses the principles of carbon sequestration in reservoir rocks, the main mechanisms of capture that operate when CO2 enters a geological repository; it is shown that research in the field of underground CO2 storage is aimed at reducing the uncertainty in the efficiency of CO2 storage in rocks, however, the effect of CO2 on natural porous media is currently poorly understood. Laboratory studies are required, followed by the development of mathematical models of the rocks interaction with various carbon gases types to develop recommendations for optimal modes of carbon injection into the reservoir for the purpose of additional oil recovery in the short term and carbon absorption by the rock and its storage in the long term.

Keywords

carbon sequestrationCCUSdecarbonizationcarbon dioxideCO2 utilizationCO2 storageunderground gas storageenhanced oil recoverycarbon dioxide injection for enhanced oil recovery

Влияние секвестрации углерода в горных породах на изменение фильтрационных и механических характеристик пласта при доизвлечении запасов нефти

Технология CCUS (Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage – улавливание, использование и хранение углерода) становится ключевой технологией для достижения значительного сокращения глобальных выбросов углерода в течение следующего столетия, в связи с чем вопросам секвестрации углерода в естественных пористых средах в последнее время в научном сообществе уделяется все больше внимание. Зарубежными учеными получены некоторые лабораторные наработки, а в ряде стран уже реализуются проекты секвестрации углерода. Для России секвестрация углерода в пористых геологических средах перспективна ввиду значительного потенциала подземных ёмкостей для захоронения СО2, возможности использовать СО2 для повышения нефтеотдачи, а также развитой инфраструктуры нефтегазовых месторождений. Волго-Уральская нефтегазоносная провинция может стать одним из перспективных регионов для создания CCUS-кластера ввиду сочетания на территории таких факторов, как значительное количество предприятий-эмитентов СО2 и огромное количество ловушек нефти и газа, потенциально пригодных для применения методов увеличения нефтеотдачи и/или захоронения СО2. В статье рассмотрены принципы секвестрации углерода в породах-коллекторах, основные механизмы улавливания, действующие при попадании СО2 в геологическое хранилище; показано, что исследования в области подземного хранения CO2 направлены на снижение неопределенности в эффективности хранения CO2 в горных породах, однако влияние СО2 на естественные пористые среды на текущий момент является малоизученным. Требуется проведение лабораторных исследований, последующая разработка математических моделей взаимодействия горных пород с различными типами углеродных газов для разработки рекомендаций по оптимальным режимам закачки углерода в пласт с целью доизвлечения нефти в краткосрочной перспективе и абсорбирования горной породой углерода и его хранения в долгосрочной перспективе.

Ключевые слова

секвестрация углеродаCCUSдекарбонизацияуглекислый газдиоксид углеродаутилизация СО2хранение СО2подземное газохранилищеувеличение нефтеотдачизакачка углекислого газа для повышения нефтеотдачи

Bibliography

1.Chang Y., Gao S., Wei Y., Li G. Enhancing investment strategies for CCUS deployment in China: implications from a real options-based multiphase unequal investment approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-05693-0 Scholar
2.Sun B., Tao J. Investment Decisions of CCUS Projects in China Considering the Supply-Demand Relationship of CO2 from the Industry Symbiosis Perspective. Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, no. 12, 5273 p. DOI: 10.3390/su16125273 Scholar
3.Balaji K., Rabiei M. Carbon dioxide pipeline route optimization for carbon capture, utilization, and storage: A case study for North-Central USA. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2022, vol. 51, 101900 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.01900 Scholar
4.Li L., Liu Y., Li Y. et al. Overview of Typical Projects for Geological Storage of CO2 in Offshore Saline Aquifers. Liquids, 2024, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 744-767. DOI: 10.3390/liquids4040042 Scholar
5.Hansen L.M. Australia well positioned to become a CCUS leader. The APPEA Journal, 2022, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. S25-S28. DOI: 10.1071/AJ21107 Scholar
6.Kozhevnikov E.V., Turbakov M.S., Riabokon E.P., Gladkikh E.A., Poplygin V.V. Cyclic confining pressure and rock permeability: Mechanical compaction or fines migration. Heliyon, 2023, vol. 9, no. 11, e21600 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21600 Scholar
7.Kozhevnikov E.V., Turbakov M.S., Riabokon E.P., Gladkikh E.A. Apparent Permeability Evolution Due to Colloid Migration Under Cyclic Confining Pressure: On the Example of Porous Limestone. Transport in Porous Media, 2024, vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 263-286. DOI: 10.1007/s11242-023-01979-5 Scholar
8.Poplygin V.V., Qi C., Guzev M.A., Riabokon E.P., Turbakov M.S., Kozhevnikov E.V. Influence of Frequency of Wave Action on Oil Production. International Journal of Engineering, 2022, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 2072-2076. DOI: 10.5829/JIE.2022.35.118.02 Scholar
9.Poplygin V., Qi C., Guzev M., Kozhevnikov E., Kunitskikh A. Riabokon, E., Turbakov M. Assessment of the Elastic-Wave Well Treatment in Oil-Bearing Clastic and Carbonate Reservoirs. Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing, 2023, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1495-1505. DOI: 10.32604/fdmp.2023.022335 Scholar
10.Stacey J., Corlett H., Hollis C., Hills D. Reservoir evaluation of dolomitized Devonian strata in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin: implications for carbon capture, utilization, and storage. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2024, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 334-353. DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2023.082 Scholar
11.Riabokon E., Gladkikh E., Turbakov M., Kozhevnikov E., Guzev M., Popov N., Kamenev P. Effects of ultrasonic oscillations on permeability of rocks during the paraffinic oil flow. Geotechnique Letters, 2023, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 151-157. DOI: 10.1680/gele.22.00137 Scholar
12.Dymochkina M.G., Samodurov M.S., Pavlov V.A., Penigin A.V., Ushmaev O.S. Geologicheskii potentsial ulavlivaniia i khraneniiia dioksida ugleroda v Rossiiakoi Federatsii [Geological potential of carbon dioxide capture and storage of the Russian Federation]. Neftianizov Khoziaistvo, 2021, no. 12, pp. 20-23. DOI: 10.24887/0028-2448-2021-12-20-23 Scholar
13.Riabokon E., Turbakov M., Kozhevnikov E., Poplygin V., Jing H. The Belthofen effect in Testing saturated Carbonate Geomaterials. Materials, 2023, vol. 16, no. 8, 3024 p. DOI: 10.3390/ma16083024 Scholar
14.Bachu S., Gunter W.D., Perkins E.H. Aquifer disposal of CO2: Hydrodynamic and mineral trapping. Energy Conversion and Management, 1994, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 269-279. DOI: 10.1016/0196-8904(94)90060-4 Scholar
15.IPCC, 2005: IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. B. Metz, O. Scholar
16.Snippe J., Tucker O. CO2, fate comparison for depleted gas field and dipping saline aquifer. Energy Procedia, 2014, vol. 63, pp. 5586-5601. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.592 Scholar
17.Gunter W.D., Benson S., Bachu S. The role of hydrogeological and geochemical trapping in sedimenting basins for secure geological storage for carbon dioxide. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004, no. 233, pp. 129-145. DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.233.01.09 Scholar
18.Tudavchev A.V., Konosavskii P.K., Pereverzeva S.A., Tikhomirov V.V. Otsenka vozmozhnosti zakhoroneniya uglekislogo gaza v Severo-Stavropol'skom PKhG [Assessment of the possibility of carbon dioxide disposal in the Severo-Stavropolsk UGS]. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem «Geotermal'naya vulkanologiya, gidrogeologiya, geologiya nefti i gaza» (Geothermal Volcanoology Workshop 2020), 2020, pp. 147-150. Scholar
19.Polak S., Grimstad A.-A. Reservoir simulation study of CO2 storage and CO2-EGR in the Aztbach-Schwanenstadt gas field in Austria. Energy Procedia, 2009, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2961-2968. Scholar
20.Raza A., Gholami R., Rezaee R., Han Bing C., Nagarajan R., Ali Hamid M. CO2 storage in depleted gas reservoirs: A study on the effect of residual gas saturation. Petroleum, 2018, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 95. DOI: 10.1016/j.petl.2017.05.005 Scholar
21.Zatsepina O., Hassanzadeh H., Pooladi-Darvish M. Geological Storage of CO2 as Hydrate in a McMurray Depleted Gas Reservoir. Gas Injection for Disposal and Enhanced Recovery. Part IV: Carbon Dioxide Storage, 2014, pp. 311-329. DOI: 10.1002/9781118938607.ch18 Scholar
22.Underschultz J., Boreham C., Dance T., Stalker L., Freifeld B., Kirste D., Ennis-King J. CO2 storage in a depleted gas field: an overview of the CO2CRC Otway Project and initial results. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 2011, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 922-932. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.02.009 Scholar
23.Jikich S.A., Smith D.H., Sams W.N., Bromhal G.S. Enhanced Gas Recovery (EGR) with carbon dioxide sequestration: a simulation study of effects of injection strategy and operational parameters. SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Society of Petroleum Engineers. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2003, pp. 1-10. DOI: 10.2118/84813-MS Scholar
24.Khan C., Amin R., Madden G. Carbon dioxide injection for enhanced gas recovery and storage (reservoir simulation). Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 2013, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 225-240. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpe.2013.06.002 Scholar
25.A fresh approach Scholar
26.Matter J.M., Takahashi T., Goldberg D. Experimental evaluation of in situ CO₂-water-rock reactions during CO₂ injection in basaltic rocks: Implications for geological CO₂ sequestration. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2007, vol. 8, no. 2, p. Q02001. DOI: 10.1029/2006GC001427 Scholar
27.Krevor S.C.M., Pini R., Zuo L., Benson S.M. Relative permeability and trapping of CO₂ and water in sandstone rocks at reservoir conditions. Water Resources Research, 2012, vol. 48, no. 2, p. W02532. DOI: 10.1029/2011WR010859 Scholar
28.Xiao Y., Xu T., Pruess K. The effects of gas-fluid-rock interactions on CO2 injection and storage: Insights from reactive transport modeling. Energy Procedia, 2009, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1783-1790. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.233 Scholar
29.Stacey J., Corlett H., Holland G., Koehishdayutallah A., Cao C., Swart P., Crowley S., Hollis C. Regional fault-controlled shallow dolomitization of the Middle Cambrian Cathedral Formation by hydrothermal fluids fluxed through a basal clastic aquifer. GSA Bulletin, 2021, vol. 133, no. 11-12, pp. 2355-2377. DOI: 10.1130/B35927.1 Scholar
30.Korzun A.V., Stupakova A.V., Kharitonova N.A. et al. Primenimost’ prirodnykh geologicheskikh ob’ektov dlia khraneniiia, zakhoroneniiia i utilizatsii ugleklisogo gaza (obzor) [Applicability of natural geological objects for storage, disposal and utilization of carbon dioxide (review)]. Georesursy, 2023, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 22-35. DOI: 10.18599/gs.2023.2.2 Scholar
31.Kozhevnikov E.V., Turbakov M.S., Gladkikh E.A., Riabokon E.P., Poplygin V.V., Guzev M.A., Qi C., Jing H. Colloidal-induced permeability degradation assessment of porous media. Géotechnique Letters, 2022, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 217-224. DOI: 10.1680/gjele.22.00017 Scholar
32.Kozhevnikov E.V., Turbakov M.S., Gladkikh E.A., Riabokon E.P., Poplygin V.V., Guzev M.A., Qi C., Kunitskikh A.A. Colloid Migration As A Reason For Porous Sandstone Permeability Degradation During Coreflooding. Energies, 2022, vol. 15, no. 8, 2845 p. DOI: 10.3390/en15082845 Scholar
33.Al-Khdheeawi E.A., Vialle S., Barifcani A., Sarmadivaleh M., Iglauer S. Impact of reservoir wettability and heterogeneity on CO2-plume migration and trapping capacity. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, vol. 58, pp. 142-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.01.012 Scholar
34.Iglauer S., Pentland C.H., Busch A.CO, wettability of seal and reservoir rocks and the implications for carbon geo-sequestration. Water Resources Research, 2015, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 729-774. DOI: 10.1002/2014WR015553 Scholar
35.Al-Khdheeawi E.A., Vialle S., Barifcani A., Sarmadivaleh M., Iglauer S. Influence of injection well configuration and rock wettability on CO2 plume behaviour and CO2 trapping capacity in heterogeneous reservoirs. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, vol. 43, pp. 190-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.03.016 Scholar
36.Gumerov F.M. Perspektivy primeneniia dioksida ugleroda dlia uvelicheniia neftodachi plastov [Prospects for the use of carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery]. Aktual’nye voprosy issledovanii plastovykh sistem mostorozhdenii uglevodorodov, 2010, part II, pp. 93-108. Scholar
37.Saele A.M., Graue A., Alcorn Z.P. The Effect of Rock Type on CO2 Foam for CO2, EOR and CO2 Storage. International Petroleum Technology Conference. Bangkok, Thailand, 2023. DOI: 10.2523/IPTC-22918-MS Scholar
38.Xu Zh., Li Zh., Liu Zh., Li B., Zhang Q., Zheng L., Song Y., Husein M.M. Characteristics of CO2 foam plugging and migration: Implications for geological carbon storage and utilization in fractured reservoirs. Separation and Purification Technology, 2022, vol. 294, 121191 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121190 Scholar
39.Emel’ianov K., Zotov N. Ekonomia na dekarbonizatsii [Savings on decarbonization]. Energeticheskaia politika, 2021, no. 10 (164), pp. 26-37. DOI: 10.46920/2409- 5516.2021.10164.26 Scholar
40.Kolokol’tsev S.N. Napravlenie primeneniia dioksida ugleroda Tsentral’no-Astrakhanskogo gazokondensatnogo mostorozhdeniia [Direction of carbon dioxide central- Astrakhan gas-condensate field]. Geologija, geografija i global’naia energija, 2016, no. 2 (61), pp. 47-56. Scholar
41.Krasnoperova S.A. Problema utilizatsii poputnogo neftianogo gaza na primere neftialnogo mostorozhdeniia Udmurtskoi respubliki [The problem of the utilization of associated petroleum gas on the example of an oil field in the Udmurt republic]. Upravlenie tekhnosferoi, 2021, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 63-74. DOI: 10.34828/UdSU.2021.65.70.007 Scholar
42.Bogomolova E.U., Elina I.D., Kuz’mina Z.S. Khranenie i utilizatsiia ugleklisogo gaza v ramkakh ispolneniia gazovoi programmy i povysheniia effektivnosti “zelenykh investitsii” [Storage and utilization of carbon dioxide as part of the implementation of the gas program and improving the efficiency of “green investments”]. Otkhody i resursy, 2022, vol. 9, no. 2. DOI: 10.15862/17ECOR222 Scholar
43.Li X., Chai B., Qi C., Kunitskikh A.A., Kozhevnikov E.V. An analytical compressive-shear fracture model influenced by thermally treated microcracks in brittle solids. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 2023, vol. 93, no. 10, pp. 3765-3773. DOI: 10.1007/s00419-023-02484-3 Scholar
44.Schultz R., Wang R., Gu Y.J., Haug K., Atkinson G. A seismological overview of the induced earthquakes in the Duvernay play near Fox Creek, Alberta. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2017, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 492-505. DOI: 10.1002/2016JB013570 Scholar
45.Mathieson A. et al. CO2 sequestration monitoring and verification technologies applied at Krechba, Algeria. The Leading Edge, 2010, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 216-222. DOI: 10.1190/1.3304827 Scholar

1.Enhancing investment strategies for CCUS deployment in China: implications from a real options-based multiphase unequal investment approach / Y. Chang, S. Gao, Y. Wei, G. Li // Environment, Development and Sustainability. – 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-05693-0 Scholar
2.Sun, B. Investment Decisions of CCUS Projects in China Considering the Supply-Demand Relationship of CO2 from the Industry Symbiosis Perspective / B. Sun, J. Tao // Sustainability. – 2024. – Vol. 16, no. 12. – P. 5273. DOI: 10.3390/su16125273 Scholar
3.Balaji, K. Carbon dioxide pipeline route optimization for carbon capture, utilization, and storage: A case study for North-Central USA / K. Balaji, M. Rabiei // Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. – 2022. – Vol. 51. – P. 101900. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101900 Scholar
4.Overview of Typical Projects for Geological Storage of CO2 in Offshore Saline Aquifers / L. Li, Y. Liu, Y. Li [et al.] // Liquids. –2024. – Vol. 4, no. 4. – P. 744-767. DOI: 10.3390/liquids4040042 Scholar
5.Hansen, L.M. Australia well positioned to become a CCUS leader / L.M. Hansen // The APPEA Journal. – 2022. – Vol. 62, no. 2. – P. S25-S28. DOI: 10.1071/AJ21107 Scholar
6.Cyclic confining pressure and rock permeability: Mechanical compaction or fines migration / E.V. Kozhevnikov, M.S. Turbakov, E.P. Riabokon, E.A. Gladkikh, V.V. Poplygin // Heliyon. – 2023. – Vol. 9, no. 11. – P. e21600. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21600 Scholar
7.Apparent Permeability Evolution Due to Colloid Migration Under Cyclic Confining Pressure: On the Example of Porous Limestone / E.V. Kozhevnikov, M.S. Turbakov, E.P. Riabokon, E.A. Gladkikh // Transport in Porous Media. – 2024. – Vol. 151, no. 2. – P. 263-286. DOI: 10.1007/s11242-023-01979-5 Scholar
8.Influence of Frequency of Wave Action on Oil Production / V.V. Poplygin, C. Qi, M.L.A. Guzev, E.P. Riabokon, M.S. Turbakov, E.V. Kozhevnikov // International Journal of Engineering. – 2022. – Vol. 35, no. 11. – P. 2072-2076. DOI: 10.5829/LIE.2022.35.11B.02 Scholar
9.Assessment of the Elastic-Wave Well Treatment in Oil-Bearing Elastic and Carbonate Reservoirs / V. Poplygin, C. Qi, M. Guzev, E. Kozhevnikov, A. Kunitskikh, E. Riabokon, M. Turbakov // Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing. – 2023. – Vol. 19, no. 6. – P. 1495-1505. DOI: 10.32604/fdmp.2023.022335 Scholar
10.Reservoir evaluation of dolomitized Devonian strata in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin: implications for carbon capture, utilization, and storage / J. Stacey, H. Corlett, C. Hollis, D. Hills // Journal of Sedimentary Research. – 2024. – Vol. 94, no. 3. – P. 334-353. DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2023.082 Scholar
11.Effects of ultrasonic oscillations on permeability of rocks during the paraffin oil flow / E. Riabokon, E. Gladkikh, M. Turbakov, E. Kozhevnikov, M. Guzev, N. Popov, P. Kamenev // Geotechnique Letters. – 2023. – V. 13, no. 3. – P. 151-157. DOI: 10.1168/jgele.22.00137 Scholar
12.Геологический потенциал улавливания и хранения диоксида углерода в Российской Федерации / М.Г. Дымокчина, М.С. Самодуров, В.А. Павлов, А.В. Пенигин, О.С. Ушмаев // Нефтяное хозяйство. – 2021. – № 12. – С. 20-23. Scholar
13.The Rehbinder Effect in Testing Saturated Carbonate Geomaterials / E. Riabokon, M. Turbakov, E. Kozhevnikov, V. Poplygin, H. Jing // Materials. – 2023. Vol. 16, no. 8. – P. 3024. DOI: 10.3390/ma16083024 Scholar
14.Bachu S. Aquifer disposal of CO2: Hydrodynamic and mineral trapping / S. Bachu, W.D. Gunter, E.H. Perkins // Energy Conversion and Management. – 1994. – Vol. 35, no. 4. – P. 269-279. DOI: 10.1016/0196-8904(94)90060-4 Scholar
15.IPCC, 2005: IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change / B. Metz, O. Davidson, H.C. de Coninck, M. Loos, L.A. Meyer (eds.). – Cambridge, United Kingdom, New York: Cambridge University Press, 442 p. Scholar
16.Snippe, J. CO2, fate comparison for depleted gas field and dipping saline aquifer / J. Snippe, O. Tucker // Energy Procedia. – 2014. – Vol. 63. – P. 5586-5601. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.592 Scholar
17.Gunter, W.D. The role of hydrogeological and geochemical trapping in sedimenting baysins for secure geological storage for carbon dioxide / W.D. Gunter S. Benson, S. Bachu // Geological Society, London, Special Publications. – 2004. – No. 233. – P. 129-145. DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.233.01.09 Scholar
18.Оценка возможности захоронения углекислого газа в Северо-Ставропольском ПХГ / А.В. Тудавчев, П.К. Коносавский, С.А. Переверзева, В.В. Тихомиров // Материалы Всероссийской научной конференции с международным участием «Геотермальная вулканология, гидрогеология, геология нефти и газа» (Geothermal Volcanoology Workshop 2020). – 2020. – С. 147-150. Scholar
19.Polak, S. Reservoir simulation study of CO2 storage and CO2-EGR in the Aztbach-Schwanenstadt gas field in Austria / S. Polak, A.-A. Grimstad // Energy Procedia. – 2009. – Vol. 1, no. 1. – P. 2961-2968. Scholar
20.CO2 storage in depleted gas reservoirs: A study on the effect of residual gas saturation / A. Raza, R. Gholami, R. Rezaee, C. Han Bing, R. Nagarajan, M. Ali Hamid // Petroleum. – 2018. – Vol. 4, no. 1. – P. 95. DOI: 107.10.1016/j.petl.2017.05.005 Scholar
21.Zatsepina, O. Geological Storage of CO2 as Hydrate in a McMurray Depleted Gas Reservoir / O. Zatsepina, H. Hassanzadeh, M. Pooladi-Darvish // Gas Injection for Disposal and Enhanced Recovery. Part IV: Carbon Dioxide Storage. – 2014. – P. 311-329. DOI: 10.1002/9781118938607.ch18 Scholar
22.CO2 storage in a depleted gas field: an overview of the CO2CRC Otway Project and initial results, / J. Underschultz, C. Boreham, T. Dance, L. Stalker, B. Freifeld, D. Kirste, J. Ennis-King // Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. – 2011. – Vol. 5, no. 4. – P. 922-932. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.02.009 Scholar
23.Enhanced Gas Recovery (EGR) with carbon dioxide sequestration: a simulation study of effects of injection strategy and operational parameters / S.A. Jikich, D.H. Smith, W.N. Sams, G.S. Bromhal // SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Society of Petroleum Engineers. – Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2003. – P. 1-10. DOI: 10.2118/84813-MS Scholar
24.Khan, C. Carbon dioxide injection for enhanced gas recovery and storage (reservoir simulation) / C. Khan, R. Amin, G. Madden // Egyptian Journal of Petroleum. – 2013. – Vol. 22, no. 2. – P. 225-240. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpe.2013.06.002 Scholar
25.A fresh approach Scholar
26.Matter, J.M. Experimental evaluation of in situ CO₂-water-rock reactions during CO₂ injection in basaltic rocks: Implications for geological CO₂ sequestration / J.M. Matter, T. Takahashi, D. Goldberg // Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. – 2007. – Vol. 8, no. 2. – P. Q02001. DOI: 10.1029/2006GC001427 Scholar
27.Relative permeability and trapping of CO₂ and water in sandstone rocks at reservoir conditions / S.C.M. Krevor, R. Pini, L. Zuo, S.M. Benson // Water Resources Research. – 2012. – Vol. 48, no. 2. – P. W02532. DOI: 10.1029/2011WR010859 Scholar
28.Xiao, Y. The effects of gas-fluid-rock interactions on CO₂ injection and storage: Insights from reactive transport modeling / Y. Xiao, T. Xu, K. Pruess // Energy Procedia. – 2009. – Vol. 1, no. 1. – P. 1783–1790. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.233 Scholar
29.Regional fault-controlled shallow dolomitization of the Middle Cambrian Cathedral Formation by hydrothermal fluids fluxed through a basal clastic aquifer / J. Stacey, H. Corlett, G. Holland, A. Keeshidayatullah, C. Cao, P. Swart, S. Crowley, C. Hollis // GSA Bulletin. – 2021. – Vol. 133, no. 11–12. – P. 2355–2377. DOI: 10.1130/B35927.1 Scholar
30.Применяемость природных геологических объектов для хранения, захоронения и утилизации углекислого газа (обзор) / А.В. Корзун, А.В. Ступакова, Н.А. Харитонова [и др.] // Георесурсы. – 2023. – Т. 25, № 2. – С. 22–35. DOI: 10.18599/gsr.2023.2.2 Scholar
31.Colloidal-induced permeability degradation assessment of porous media / E.V. Kozhevnikov, M.S. Turbakov, E.A. Gladkikh, E.P. Riabokon, V.V. Poplygin, M.A. Guzev, C. Qi, H. Jing // Geotechnique Letters. – 2022. – Vol. 12, no. 3. – P. 217–224. DOI: 10.1680/gele.22.00017 Scholar
32.Colloid Migration As A Reason For Porous Sandstone Permeability Degradation During Coreflooding / E.V. Kozhevnikov, M.S. Turbakov, E.A. Gladkikh, E.P. Riabokon, V.V. Poplygin, M.A. Guzev, C. Qi, A.A. Kunitskikh // Energies. – 2022. – Vol. 15, no. 8. – P. 2845. DOI: 10.3390/en15082845 Scholar
33.Impact of reservoir wettability and heterogeneity on CO₂-plume migration and trapping capacity / E.A. Al-Khdeweawi, S. Vialle, A. Barifcani, M. Sarmadivaleh, S. Iglauer // International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. – 2017. – Vol. 58. – P. 142–158. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.01.012 Scholar
34.Iglauer, S. CO₂ wettability of seal and reservoir rocks and the implications for carbon geo-sequestration / S. Iglauer, C.H. Pentland, A. Busch // Water Resources Research. – 2015. – Vol. 51, no. 1. – P. 729–774. DOI: 10.1002/2014WR015553 Scholar
35.Influence of injection well configuration and rock wettability on CO₂ plume behavior and Engineering. – 2017. – Vol. 43. – P. 190–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.03.016 Scholar
36.Гумеров, Ф.М. Перспективы применения диоксида углерода для увеличения нефтеотдачи пластов / Ф.М. Гумеров // Актуальные вопросы исследований пластовых систем месторождений углеводородов. – 2010. – Ч. II. – С. 93–108. Scholar
37.Sæle, A.M. The Effect of Rock Type on CO₂ Foam for CO₂ EOR and CO₂ Storage / A.M. Sæle, A. Graue, Z.P. Alcorn // International Petroleum Technology Conference. – Bangkok, Thailand, 2023. DOI: 10.2523/ITPC-22918-MS Scholar
38.Characteristics of CO₂ foam plugging and migration: Implications for geological carbon storage and utilization in fractured reservoirs / Zh. Xu, Zh. Li, Zh. Liu, B. Li, Q. Zhang, L. Zheng, Y. Song, M.M. Husein // Separation and Purification Technology. – 2022. – Vol. 294. – P. 121191. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121190 Scholar
39.Емельянов, К. Экономия на декарбонизации / К. Емельянов, Н. Зотов // Энергетическая политика. – 2021. – № 10 (164). – С. 26–37. DOI: 10.46920/2409-5516.2021.10164.26 Scholar
40.Колокольцев, С.Н. Направление применения диоксида углерода Центрально-Астраханского газоконденсатного месторождения / С.Н. Колокольцев // Геология, география и глобальная энергия. – 2016. – № 2 (61). – С. 47–56. Scholar
41.Красноперова С.А. Проблема утилизации попутного нефтяного газа на примере нефтяного месторождения Удмуртской республики / С.А. Красноперова // Управление техносферой. – 2021. – Т. 4, № 1. – С. 63–74. DOI: 10.34828/UdSU.2021.65.70.007 Scholar
42.Богомолова, Е.Ю. Хранение и утилизация углекислого газа в рамках исполнения газовой программы и повышения эффективности «зеленых инвестиций» / Е.Ю. Богомолова, И.Д. Елина, З.С. Кузьмина // Отходы и ресурсы. – 2022. – Т. 9, № 2. DOI: 10.15862/17ECOR222 Scholar
43.An analytical compressive-shear fracture model influenced by thermally treated microcracks in brittle solids / X. Li, B. Chai, C. Qi, A.A. Kunitskikh, E.V. Kozhevnikov // Archive of Applied Mechanics. – 2023. – Vol. 93, no. 10. – P. 3765–3773. DOI: 10.1007/s00419-023-02484-3 Scholar
44.A seismological overview of the induced earthquakes in the Duvernay play near Fox Creek, Alberta / R. Schultz, R. Wang, Y.J. Gu, K. Haug, G. Atkinson // Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. – 2017. – Vol. 122, no. 1. – P. 492–505. DOI: 10.1002/2016JB013570 Scholar
45.CO₂ sequestration monitoring and verification technologies applied at Krechba, Algeria / A. Mathieson [et al.] // The Leading Edge. – 2010. – Vol. 29, no. 2. – P. 216–222. DOI: 10.1190/1.3304827 Scholar

Article information

Published: 24 February 2025
Issue date: 24 February 2025
Issue: Vol. 25, No. 1 (2025)