Identification and verification of visco-hyperelastic constants of defining relations for shock absorbing rubber

Author details

Abstract

Nowadays, highly elastic materials showing pronounced rheological properties that contribute to the reduction of peak amplitudes of vibrations in resonance modes are widely used in the designs of vibration-protective devices. The design of such structures in modern conditions requires the construction of a mathematical model, the most important part of which are the defining relations for the description of viscoelastic and hyperelastic behavior of the material and an adequate methodology for the identification of material constants. The purpose of this study is to construct a methodology for determining the visco-hyperelastic properties of a material based on quasi-static test data. In describing the hyperelastic behavior of the material, the Mooney – Rivlin strain energy potential with two constants and Neo-Hookean potential with consideration of compressibility were used, and when viscoelasticity was taken into account, the relaxation function was expanded into Prony series. Semi-analytical expressions of stress dependence on principal strains and time with account of visco-hyperelastic behavior of the material in cases of uniaxial stressed and uniaxial deformed states are obtained. To select the optimum distribution of approximation parameters of relative shear moduli and range of relaxation times, the effect of changing viscoelastic parameters on the magnitude of hysteresis and maximum stresses in the cycle at different strain rates was evaluated. The results of full-scale cyclic tests in free tension and compression and constrained compression were used to calculate material constants. A procedure for determining the visco-hyperelastic properties of the material has been developed, which consists in minimizing the difference between the results of mechanical tests and the response values calculated using the constructed semi-analytical expressions using the Nelder – Mead method. As a result, the hyperelastic and viscoelastic material properties were determined, which agree with the experimental curves with reasonable accuracy. It is shown that the Neo-Hookean potential with its simpler form allows describing the data of mechanical tests on a par with the Mooney – Rivlin potential with two constants. The calculated material properties were verified by comparing the shock absorber test data and the results of numerical simulation of the shock absorber deformation.

Keywords

hyperelasticityviscoelasticityMooney – Rivlin potentialNeo-Hookean potentialmaterial propertiesrubbercyclic deformation

Bibliography

  1. 1.Arani H.K., Shariyat M. Nonlinear Dynamic Response of an Abruptly Loaded Rubber-Like Hyperelastic Plate Resting on a Dissipative Viscoelastic Winkler–Pasternak Medium. Iran J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Mech. Eng, 2023, Vol. 47, pp. 219-236. doi: s40997-022-00512-1 Scholar
  2. 2.Buchen S., Kroger N.H., Reppel T., Weinberg K. Time-dependent modeling and experimental characterization of foamed EPDM rubber. Continuum Mech. Thermodyn, 2021, Vol. 33, pp. 1747-1764. doi: 10.1007/s00161-021-01004-4 Scholar
  3. 3.Ramzanpour M., Hosseini-Farid M., McLean J., Ziejewski M., Karami G. Visco-hyperelastic characterization of human brain white matter micro-level constituents in different strain rates. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput, 2020, Vol. 58, pp. 2107-2118. doi: 10.1007/s11517-020-02228-3 Scholar
  4. 4.Smetannikov O.Yu., Faskhutdinova Iu.B., Subbotin E.V. Issledovanie sredstvami ANSYS effekta pamiati formy v izdeliiakh iz sshitogo polietilena [ANSYS research of shape memory effects in cross-linked polyethylene products]. Vychislitel'nai mekhanika sploshnykh sred - Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 2020, Vol. 13, pp. 134-149. doi: 10.7242/1999-6691/2020.13.2.11 Scholar
  5. 5.Zhang J., Jiao C., Zou D., Ta N., Rao Z. Assigning viscoelastic and hyperelastic properties to the middle-ear soft tissues for sound transmission. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 2020, Vol. 19, pp. 957-970. doi: 10.1007/s10237-019-01263-w Scholar
  6. 6.Ortigosa-Martinez R., Martinez-Frutos J., Mora-Corral C., Pedregal P., Periago F. Mathematical modeling, analysis and control in soft robotics: a survey. SeMA, 2024, Vol. 81, pp. 147-164. doi: 10.1007/s40324-023-00334-4 Scholar
  7. 7.Hejazi F., Farahpour H., Ayyash N. Seismic performance of structure equipped with a new rubber bracing damper system. Archiv. Civ. Mech. Eng, 2024, Vol. 24. doi: 10.1007/s43452-023-00845-x Scholar
  8. 8.Lur'e A.I. Teoria uprugosti [Theory of elasticity]. Moscow, Nauka, 1970, 940 p. Scholar
  9. 9.Adamov A.A., Matveenko V.P., Trufanov N.A., et al. Metody prikladnoi viakzouprugosti [Methods of applied viscoelasticity]. Ekaterinburg, UrO RAN, 2003, 411 p. Scholar
  10. 10.Arruda E.M., Boyce M.C. A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubber elastic materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1993, Vol. 41, pp. 389-412. Scholar
Download PDF

Article information

Published
8 December 2025
Issue date
8 December 2025
Issue
No. 4 (2025)
Share